Your security, networking, programming, and application news source.
Google

Sunday, February 12, 2012

Steam Warns User's Personal Info and Credit Card Data Swiped in Last Year's Intrusion


<Steam>, the popular gaming digital rights management platform by <Valve>, pushed an update today containing an "update news" page, which warned of the discovery that personal data was stolen in last year's intrusion. Steam warned that a copy of a backup file about transactions between 2004 and 2008 may have been obtained. Steam assured that no Steam account passwords were included, but mentioned the following user data being contained in the taken data:

  • User Names
  • EMail Addresses
  • Encrypted Billing Adresses
  • Encrypted Credit Card Information



Steam Update News Text:
February 10th, 2012
Dear Steam Users and Steam Forum Users:

We continue our investigation of last year’s intrusion
with the help of outside security experts. In my last
note about this, I described how intruders had accessed
our Steam database but we found no evidence that the
intruders took information from that database. That is
still the case.

Recently we learned that it is probable that the
intruders obtained a copy of a backup file with 
information about Steam transactions between 2004 and
2008. This backup file contained user names, email
addresses, encrypted billing addresses and encrypted
credit card information. It did not include Steam
passwords.

We do not have any evidence that the encrypted credit
card numbers or billing addresses have been compromised.
However as I said in November it’s a good idea to watch
your credit card activity and statements. And of course
keeping Steam Guard on is a good idea as well.

We are still investigating and working with law
enforcement authorities. Some state laws require a more
formal notice of this incident so some of you will get
that notice, but we wanted to update everyone with this
new information now.

Gabe

Tuesday, January 17, 2012

Fight SOPA and PROTECT IP

This blog would be forced offline if the currently proposed U.S. legislature is passed.

SOPA and PROTECT IP are poorly defined, easily abused, unclear bills proposed to the U.S. House and Senate with unrealistic expectations of Internet technology, which will stifle free speech and innovation while giving the U.S. Government the ability to censor the U.S. Internet and seize U.S. domain names with little reason or limitation. Enforcement of these bills would require the restructuring of many web services which would affect Internet users globally.

These bills threaten a blog like this through vague terminology lacking definitions, such as "committing or facilitating the commission of criminal violations" [of copyright infringement or counterfeit products]. "Facilitation" can often be argued as simply teaching or demonstrating how to do something. As I interpret this, any website with Hacking/Hacker/Hack in the name or topic would technically be automatically out of compliance and be at the mercy of enforcement of these laws to not permanently seize associated domain names and possibly further prosecute owners.

These bills create a largely undefined take down process that will clearly leave many types of web services, such as the free blog host here at blogger.com, unable to meet requirements. No provisions for abuse make these vague bills a prime target for more abuse than the DMCA takedown request system has historically endured.

Some other concerning areas of these bills include provisions against circumvention of such measures, which the U.S. State department funds creating hypocritical tools for doing just that, to offer citizens under [foreign]"repressive regimes" uncensored access to the internet.

Please do all you can to educate the public and urge U.S. citizens to contact their government representatives urging them to vote against these reckless bills.


Bill text PROTECT IP (Senate):
http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.112s968

Bill text SOPA - Stop Online Piracy Act (House):
http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.uscongress/legislation.112hr3261

A Layman's examination:
http://blog.reddit.com/2012/01/technical-examination-of-sopa-and.html

History of DCMA takedown abuse:
https://www.eff.org/takedowns

How these bills violate free speech and innovation:
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2012/01/how-pipa-and-sopa-violate-white-house-principles-supporting-free-speech

U.S. State department funds tools to circumvent censoring:
http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-04-20/u-s-funds-help-democracy-activists-evade-internet-crackdowns.html

I apologize for any inconvenience. We will be returning soon.

SoCo

Friday, January 6, 2012

Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Antisec Gives Christmas Present to the Public, Massivly Owning Stratfor's Servers

Stratfor, <(Wiki)Strategic Forecasting, Inc.>, is a global intelligence company founded in Texas in 1996. They are known for publishing security newsletters to the public. They also provide custom intelligence reports for clients such as major corporations, the U.S. military, and international government agencies.

The Antisec wing of Anonymous, revealed Saturday, on Christmas Eve, that they had compromised several("four") Stratfor servers and posted credit card details of a few Stratfor customers on IRC servers. Stratfor's site is still down with after being <(mirror)defaced>. The group claims plans to dump up to 200 gigabytes worth of data leading up to New Year’s Eve. Participants estimated they had already donated between $500,000 and $1,000,000 to charities fraudulently.

A Antisec participant explains motive for the attack, stating, “That there will be repercussions for when you choose to betray the people and side with the rich ruling classes.”

The biggest revelation seems to be how terribly insecure the security intelligence firm's servers were. Claims were made that Stratfor saved client data in clear text and even stored card security codes, a practice prohibited by credit card companies.

Stratfor, known for their secrecy and big name secret clients, has their proported client list posted (Although, some claim it may only be a subscriber list.)

<Proported client list (pastebin)>


Quinn Norton (December 26, 2011)
<Wired.com - Antisec Hits Private Intel Firm; Million of Docs Allegedly Lifted>